Educational research only—not investment advice or a recommendation. Scores and estimates may use delayed, incomplete, restated, or corrected market and filing data. Independently verify information before making an investment decision.
Tap or drag sideways to inspect a price. Use two fingers to compare automatically. Release to scroll. Use Shift + arrow keys to compare with a keyboard.
Primary reporting period: 2025-12-31 · Research updated Oct 12, 2026. A research update is not a new financial filing.
Who they are
Based in Chiayi, Taiwan, FST Corp. specializes in the full scope of activities for steel golf shafts. This includes their conceptualization, production, global marketing, and distribution. The company provides these essential components to golf club original equipment manufacturers and various distributors across the world.
How they make money
FST Corp. designs, manufactures, and sells golf club shafts under its proprietary KBS brand. The company generates revenue through direct sales to professional and retail customers, as well as by providing original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and original design manufacturer (ODM) services to international golf equipment brands.
Products & services
Golf club shafts in steel and graphite materials across premium, standard, and economy tiers, and custom-fitting services through KBS Golf Experience stores.
Brands & revenue mix
KBS
Proprietary brand for professional and retail golf club shafts.
Separate brand revenue is not available in this research.Source
Revenue share is not unit sales or a best-seller ranking. Parent brands and included sub-brands can overlap; do not add overlapping rows.
Product / operating segments
No reconciled product or operating-segment revenue breakdown is available for the current research period. Company-wide revenue remains separate from segment disclosure.
Geographic revenue
No reconciled geographic revenue breakdown was confirmed for the current research period.
Overall investment score · Quality, value, risk and opportunity
34
Poor
PoorElite
View category scores →
Company Quality
How good is the actual business—regardless of today’s stock price?
40
Weak
Financial Strength
28
Business Quality / Moat
46
Management
63
Growth Quality
47
Risk / Durability
10
Weak Company · Expensive Stock
Uses financial strength, moat, management, growth quality and durability. It excludes share price, P/E, market cap, intrinsic value and margin of safety.
Opportunity
Opportunity Score · How does the current price compare with estimated value?
17
Avoid
Based on current valuation, company quality, recent trends, and available market signals.
View score details →
Model Outlook
12-month model · What does the model think happens next?
27/100
Building Historical Record
Model Score 27/100 — estimates relative performance potential, distinct from the overall Wall Street Score and the separate Company Quality score.
Probability unavailable — the model has not produced a calibrated probability yet.
Click for full breakdown →
WSS View
The quick read
The overall Wall Street Score is low across its combined quality, valuation and risk inputs. This can reflect an expensive share price, business weaknesses, or both; check Company Quality and the category breakdown before drawing a conclusion.
At today’s price, the WSS valuation framework currently reads as less attractive based on the available valuation and market data.
The model outlook is currently cautious.
What we like
No strong positive signal is being highlighted from the currently available summary data.
What to watch
•Debt service risk
•Valuation is a weaker part of the current profile
•Revenue fundamentals are weak
•Debt / balance-sheet profile needs attention
•Asset quality is a weaker factor
Company-specific research
Questions worth answering for KBSX
Research inputs 100% complete
These questions are generated from this company's current financial and score data so the page adds context instead of treating the headline score as a stand-alone conclusion.
•Can KBSX maintain its current revenue growth rate and improve the amount of that revenue that turns into earnings and cash?
•How long can KBSX fund negative free cash flow using its current cash position before it may need more debt or new shares?
•Is KBSX's debt load manageable relative to cash generation, interest costs and upcoming maturities?
•What future growth or profitability would be needed to justify KBSX's current valuation?
Two different market-behavior signals. Momentum measures direction and trend strength. Volatility measures how large and unstable the price moves are, regardless of direction.
A high momentum score means price has been trending upward with confirming short- and medium-term strength. A low score means downward or weakening momentum.
Volatility = How violently is it moving?
A high volatility score means larger, less stable price swings. It can happen while a stock is rising or falling, so high volatility is not automatically bullish or bearish.
Important: the volatility score above is based on realized price volatility. Implied volatility (IV) comes from options prices and represents the market's expected future movement. Wall Street Score will keep IV separate and will only display it when a verified options-chain feed is available.
Notices for KBSX
Detected from reported data — verify before acting.
Debt service risk
Interest coverage is low (~-2.8x). Earnings may be strained to cover interest expense.
Community Sentiment
0 active · 0 total calls
0% Bullish (0) 0% Bearish (0)
No personal call yet on KBSX.
Potential upside factors
+Growth opportunities may come from revenue expansion, margin improvement, new products, market-share gains, and stronger cash flow.
+Proprietary KBS brand recognition.
+Integrated manufacturing and custom-fitting capabilities.
Potential downside factors
−Key risks may include competition, margin pressure, debt levels, valuation risk, and changes in demand within the Leisure industry.
−Dependence on golf industry demand and consumer discretionary spending.
−Operational risks associated with manufacturing facilities and supply chain stability.
−Negative free cash flow may increase the need for outside financing and dilution.
These research factors come from saved company research and financial data, not community votes. They are starting points to verify against filings, not buy or sell recommendations.
Create a free account to make a call.
Scores
Click any score for full breakdown
Wall Street Score
Weak34/ 100
Weak (0–50)Fair (51–71)Strong (72+)
Debt
Poor
26
Debt Cost2.4%
Debt Reduction YoY-130.0%
Debt / Equity3.79x
Tap for breakdown →
Revenue
Weak
48
Revenue YoY10.4%
Revenue CAGR29.2%
Net Margin9.7%
Tap for breakdown →
Asset
Poor
28
Asset Growth YoY2.3%
Liquidation/Share$0.36
Net Assets/MCap0.34x
Tap for breakdown →
Capital
Strong
79
Earnings Yield6.7%
Buyback Yield31.0%
Debt Cost2.4%
Tap for breakdown →
Management
Fair
63
ROIC-5.2%
ROE32.5%
ROA8.2%
Tap for breakdown →
Moat
Weak
46
EPS Growth—
FCF/Share Growth—
Rev/Share Growth13.0%
Tap for breakdown →
Valuation
Poor
22
Intrinsic Value$0.96
Value Reference$0.58
MOS-44.5%
Tap for breakdown →
Buffett
Poor
39
Revenue48
Moat46
Valuation22
Tap for breakdown →
MOS
Poor
0
MOS %-44.5%
Value Reference$0.58
Deep Discount Reference$0.38
Tap for breakdown →
Financial
Poor
25
Interest Coverage-2.8x
ROIC-5.2%
FCF Yield-2.1%
Tap for breakdown →
Master
Weak
42
Financial25
Valuation22
Debt26
Tap for breakdown →
Resilience
Poor
29
Survival Years4.5 yrs
Current Ratio0.79x
FCF Margin-3.3%
Tap for breakdown →
Was this stock page easy to understand?
One click helps us improve the research experience. This is not tied to an investment decision.
YesNot yetDismiss
Score Changes
2 historical score records available
Previous Score
21
Jul 24, 2026
Change
+12.9
points
Current Score
34
Oct 1, 2026
Category Changes
Revenue+7.7
Debt+0
Assets-10.5
Capital+46.0
Management+62.5
Moat+15.8
Valuation+22.1
Buffett+13.9
KBSX increased 12.9 points because Revenue improved by 7.7 points, Capital improved by 46 points, Management improved by 62.5 points.
Positive Contributors
+ Revenue improved by 7.7 points
+ Capital improved by 46 points
+ Management improved by 62.5 points
+ Moat improved by 15.8 points
+ Valuation improved by 22.1 points
+ Buffett improved by 13.9 points
Negative Contributors
− Asset declined by 10.5 points
Projected Score
Projected Score
32
Projected Change
-2.2 points
Preliminary comparable-period financial changes suggest decline of approximately 2.2 points. This is a projected estimate, not the official WallStreetScore.
Monetary values in USD. Share counts in raw units.
Income StatementBalance SheetCash Flow
AnnualQuarterlyTTM + Annual
All rows
Free includes 3 annual periods plus available TTM; Premium includes up to 10 annual periods. History depends on available company filings. Swipe the table horizontally to see older periods. A dash means unavailable, not zero.
Line Item
TTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
Revenue
$53.0M
$48.0M
$36.5M
$28.7M
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Cost of Revenue
$29.0M
$27.3M
$20.8M
$15.3M
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Gross Profit
$24.0M
$20.6M
$15.7M
$13.4M
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Research & Development
$1.6M
$1.5M
$1.3M
$1.5M
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
SG&A Expenses
$20.8M
$21.5M
$18.1M
$15.0M
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Operating Expenses
$22.4M
$23.0M
$19.4M
$16.6M
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
EBITDA
$3.8M
-$128K
-$1.7M
-$1.3M
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Operating Income
$1.6M
-$2.3M
-$3.6M
-$3.1M
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Interest Expense
$669K
$845K
$543K
$15K
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Income Before Tax
$5.1M
-$2.2M
-$2.8M
-$2.9M
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Income Tax Expense
-$17K
-$730K
$456K
-$751K
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Net Income
$5.1M
-$1.5M
-$3.2M
-$2.2M
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Basic EPS
$0.11
$-0.03
$-0.09
$-0.05
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Basic Shares
44.77M
44.48M
37.75M
46.21M
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Diluted Shares
44.77M
44.48M
37.75M
46.21M
····
····
····
····
····
····
····
Upgrade to Premium for up to 10 annual periods, where available.
Debt and cash show percentage changes versus the comparison period; margin shows the change in percentage points (pp). These are company-wide changes, not per-share amounts.
Financial Changes Since Prior Period
What Improved
Margins expanded
Cash position grew
What Weakened
Debt increased
Potential Score Impact
Positive indicators included revenue growth, cash levels, net income margin. Pressure indicators included EPS growth, debt levels. These factors may support or pressure the Revenue, Management, Financial, and Debt categories; this summary does not claim that the stored scores changed.
Stored Earnings Analysis
Revenue increased 9.7%. EPS declined 65.0%. Cash increased 20.9%. Total debt increased 1.2%. Net income margin improved by 17.9 percentage points.
Earnings-Call Transcript
Earnings-call transcript analysis is not currently available.
These results may influence future scores when the next evaluation is completed.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock all earnings history.View plans
Government disclosed trading activity is available on the Smart Money directory. Filings may be delayed and may not represent complete current holdings.
Dividend HistoryShare
Dividend History
Dividend data is not available yet. Missing data does not mean this company pays no dividend.
Predictions & Historical PerformanceShare
Conservative Projected Values
3 Years
$———.——
Premium
5 Years
$———.——
Premium
10 Years
$———.——
Premium
Conservative Projection Rate
——%
Premium
Conservative Projected Values — price projections derived from actual 10-year adjusted historical returns, conservatively adjusted and capped at 8% annually. These are distinct from the Outperformance Model Score and WallStreetScore.
Conservative Projected Values
Premium unlocks the 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year conservative projected values with full calculation breakdowns based on actual historical returns.
Premium includes stored forecasts and any available evaluated results. Completed results, win rates and calibrated probabilities are shown only when supported records exist; access does not create historical outcomes.